You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of intervention with board games: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13030-019-0164-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shota Noda, Kentaro Shirotsuki, Mutsuhiro Nakao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 361 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 63 | 17% |
| Unknown | 168 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 70 | 19% |
| Unknown | 172 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 316. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#109,254
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#2
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,165
of 372,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.