You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why is translating research into policy so hard? How theory can help public health researchers achieve impact?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health (Elsevier), October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.09.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Gentry, L. Milden, M.P. Kelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 36% |
| Ireland | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 8 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,169,111
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Public Health (Elsevier)
#383
of 3,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,091
of 371,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health (Elsevier)
#6
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.