↓ Skip to main content

Ivan Flis: Discipline Through Method. Recent History and Philosophy of Scientific Psychology (1950–2018)

Overview of attention for article published in Drustvena Istrazivanja, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ivan Flis: Discipline Through Method. Recent History and Philosophy of Scientific Psychology (1950–2018)
Published in
Drustvena Istrazivanja, October 2019
DOI 10.5559/di.28.3.11
Authors

Tomislav Pavlović

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#9,081,730
of 16,073,105 outputs
Outputs from Drustvena Istrazivanja
#8
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,602
of 329,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drustvena Istrazivanja
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,073,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them