↓ Skip to main content

Debris-flow monitoring and warning: Review and examples

Overview of attention for article published in Earth-Science Reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Debris-flow monitoring and warning: Review and examples
Published in
Earth-Science Reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102981
Authors

Marcel Hürlimann, Velio Coviello, Coraline Bel, Xiaojun Guo, Matteo Berti, Christoph Graf, Johannes Hübl, Shusuke Miyata, Joel B. Smith, Hsiao-Yuan Yin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Researcher 14 20%
Professor 9 13%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 42%
Engineering 14 20%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Unspecified 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 12 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,259,234
of 16,119,223 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#464
of 1,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,515
of 329,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,119,223 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.