↓ Skip to main content

A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05400-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha K. Lofters, Natalie A. Baker, Andree Schuler, Allison Rau, Alison Baxter, Nancy N. Baxter, Edward Kucharski, Fok-Han Leung, Karen Weyman, Tara Kiran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 33%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,347,379
of 16,737,500 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,039
of 6,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,579
of 332,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#98
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,737,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.