↓ Skip to main content

A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
Title
A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05400-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha K. Lofters, Natalie A. Baker, Andree Schuler, Allison Rau, Alison Baxter, Nancy N. Baxter, Edward Kucharski, Fok-Han Leung, Karen Weyman, Tara Kiran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,406,798
of 13,777,258 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,098
of 5,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,106
of 222,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#39
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,777,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.