A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2019
Aisha K. Lofters, Natalie A. Baker, Andree Schuler, Allison Rau, Alison Baxter, Nancy N. Baxter, Edward Kucharski, Fok-Han Leung, Karen Weyman, Tara Kiran
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||33%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||17%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||5||23%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||23%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||14%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||9%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 360,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.