↓ Skip to main content

A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
A “Tea and Cookies” Approach: Co-designing Cancer Screening Interventions with Patients Living with Low Income
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05400-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aisha K. Lofters, Natalie A. Baker, Andree Schuler, Allison Rau, Alison Baxter, Nancy N. Baxter, Edward Kucharski, Fok-Han Leung, Karen Weyman, Tara Kiran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,231,813
of 21,173,213 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,749
of 7,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,254
of 349,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#58
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,173,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.