| Title |
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Babbush, Dave Bacon, Joseph C. Bardin, Rami Barends, Rupak Biswas, Sergio Boixo, Fernando G. S. L. Brandao, David A. Buell, Brian Burkett, Yu Chen, Zijun Chen, Ben Chiaro, Roberto Collins, William Courtney, Andrew Dunsworth, Edward Farhi, Brooks Foxen, Austin Fowler, Craig Gidney, Marissa Giustina, Rob Graff, Keith Guerin, Steve Habegger, Matthew P. Harrigan, Michael J. Hartmann, Alan Ho, Markus Hoffmann, Trent Huang, Travis S. Humble, Sergei V. Isakov, Evan Jeffrey, Zhang Jiang, Dvir Kafri, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Julian Kelly, Paul V. Klimov, Sergey Knysh, Alexander Korotkov, Fedor Kostritsa, David Landhuis, Mike Lindmark, Erik Lucero, Dmitry Lyakh, Salvatore Mandrà, Jarrod R. McClean, Matthew McEwen, Anthony Megrant, Xiao Mi, Kristel Michielsen, Masoud Mohseni, Josh Mutus, Ofer Naaman, Matthew Neeley, Charles Neill, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Eric Ostby, Andre Petukhov, John C. Platt, Chris Quintana, Eleanor G. Rieffel, Pedram Roushan, Nicholas C. Rubin, Daniel Sank, Kevin J. Satzinger, Vadim Smelyanskiy, Kevin J. Sung, Matthew D. Trevithick, Amit Vainsencher, Benjamin Villalonga, Theodore White, Z. Jamie Yao, Ping Yeh, Adam Zalcman, Hartmut Neven, John M. Martinis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,494 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 517 | 12% |
| United States | 402 | 9% |
| Spain | 110 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 109 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 90 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 72 | 2% |
| France | 60 | 1% |
| Germany | 59 | 1% |
| India | 58 | 1% |
| Other | 680 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2337 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3838 | 85% |
| Scientists | 554 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 59 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 42 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,951 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3951 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 861 | 22% |
| Researcher | 574 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 486 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 351 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 144 | 4% |
| Other | 512 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1023 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 1448 | 37% |
| Engineering | 380 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 327 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 143 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 130 | 3% |
| Other | 392 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1131 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6581. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#467
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35
of 98,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5
of 376,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 1,059 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,059 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.