↓ Skip to main content

Consensus on the use of immune-related response criteria to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Oncology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus on the use of immune-related response criteria to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12094-019-02072-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Provencio, E. Carcereny, Á. Artal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Other 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#9,256,373
of 14,692,315 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#393
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,482
of 321,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,692,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.