↓ Skip to main content

Measuring sustainability of seed-funded earth science informatics projects

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring sustainability of seed-funded earth science informatics projects
Published in
PLoS ONE, October 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0222807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie Hsu, Vivian B. Hutchison, Madison L. Langseth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,514,293
of 14,000,788 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#23,564
of 147,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,939
of 291,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#35
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,000,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.