You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Publisher Correction: Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Methods, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41592-019-0659-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jervis Vermal Thevathasan, Maurice Kahnwald, Konstanty Cieśliński, Philipp Hoess, Sudheer Kumar Peneti, Manuel Reitberger, Daniel Heid, Krishna Chaitanya Kasuba, Sarah Janice Hoerner, Yiming Li, Yu-Le Wu, Markus Mund, Ulf Matti, Pedro Matos Pereira, Ricardo Henriques, Bianca Nijmeijer, Moritz Kueblbeck, Vilma Jimenez Sabinina, Jan Ellenberg, Jonas Ries |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Singapore | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
South Africa | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
Researcher | 4 | 27% |
Unspecified | 3 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,585,448
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#4,302
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,768
of 361,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#81
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.