↓ Skip to main content

昆虫翅の進化的起源の探索 ─進化発生学が拓く新展開─

Overview of attention for article published in Sanshi-Konchu Biotec, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
昆虫翅の進化的起源の探索 ─進化発生学が拓く新展開─
Published in
Sanshi-Konchu Biotec, October 2019
DOI 10.11416/konchubiotec.87.2_103
Authors

大出 高弘

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Sanshi-Konchu Biotec
#21
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,292
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sanshi-Konchu Biotec
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.