You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Ganann, Donna Ciliska, Helen Thomas |
| Abstract |
Policy makers and others often require synthesis of knowledge in an area within six months or less. Traditional systematic reviews typically take at least 12 months to conduct. Rapid reviews streamline traditional systematic review methods in order to synthesize evidence within a shortened timeframe. There is great variation in the process of conducting rapid reviews. This review sought to examine methods used for rapid reviews, as well as implications of methodological streamlining in terms of rigour, bias, and results. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 771 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 2% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 731 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 130 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 115 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 13% |
| Other | 60 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 187 | 24% |
| Unknown | 133 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 172 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 122 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 76 | 10% |
| Psychology | 39 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 26 | 3% |
| Other | 155 | 20% |
| Unknown | 181 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,135,439
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#215
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,494
of 96,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them