You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Food Heating and the Formation of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amine and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Mutagens/Carcinogens
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Impact of Processing on Food Safety
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, February 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4615-4853-9_12 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4613-7201-1, 978-1-4615-4853-9
|
| Authors |
Mark G. Knize, Cynthia P. Salmon, Pilar Pais, James S. Felton |
| Editors |
Lauren S. Jackson, Mark G. Knize, Jeffrey N. Morgan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,055
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,487
of 4,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,659
of 98,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#31
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.