↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Processing on Food Safety

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Impact of high-temperature food processing on fats and oils.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Impact of high-temperature food processing on fats and oils.
Chapter number 5
Book title
Impact of Processing on Food Safety
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 1999
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-4853-9_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4613-7201-1, 978-1-4615-4853-9
Authors

K Warner, Warner, K, Warner, Kathleen, Kathleen Warner

Abstract

Fats and oils are heated at high temperatures during baking, grilling and pan frying; however, deep fat frying is the most common method of high temperature treatment. Deep fat frying is a popular food preparation method because it produces desirable fried food flavor, golden brown color and crisp texture. For example, in the U.S. in 1994, approximately 12 billion pounds of fats and oils were used with 5.5 billion pounds used for frying and baking (USDA, 1995). Fried snack foods accounted for 2.9 billion pounds of oil, whereas 2 billion pounds were used for frying in restaurants (USDA, 1995). Because of such large consumption of frying oils and fats, the effects of high temperatures on these oils and fats is of major concern both for product quality and nutrition. This chapter will discuss the process of frying and the chemical and physical reactions that occur. The products formed from these reactions will be reviewed as well as information on the effects of the products and the control of these deteriorative reactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Librarian 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 13 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 14 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,836,921
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#246
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,178
of 98,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.