↓ Skip to main content

Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0417-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Gómez-Vírseda, Yves de Maeseneer, Chris Gastmans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Psychology 3 12%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Chemistry 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,288,729
of 14,534,376 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#388
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,704
of 320,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#65
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,534,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.