↓ Skip to main content

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 310)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a literature review
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2019
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20190063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renato Carneiro de Freitas Chaves, Roberto Rabello Filho, Karina Tavares Timenetsky, Fabio Tanzillo Moreira, Luiz Carlos da Silva Vilanova, Bruno de Arruda Bravim, Ary Serpa Neto, Thiago Domingos Corrêa

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a modality of extracorporeal life support that allows for temporary support in pulmonary and/or cardiac failure refractory to conventional therapy. Since the first descriptions of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, significant improvements have occurred in the device and the management of patients and, consequently, in the outcomes of critically ill patients during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Many important studies about the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome refractory to conventional clinical support, under in-hospital cardiac arrest and with cardiogenic refractory shock have been published in recent years. The objective of this literature review is to present the theoretical and practical aspects of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for respiratory and/or cardiac functions in critically ill patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 21%
Student > Master 9 8%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 47 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Unspecified 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 51 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,073,716
of 21,347,849 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#45
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,491
of 350,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them