↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Nutrition & Metabolism, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1743-7075-2-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard D Feinman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 17 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Unspecified 2 10%
Other 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Unspecified 2 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#9,994,548
of 12,487,019 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#545
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,275
of 264,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,487,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.