↓ Skip to main content

Routine monitoring of gastric residual for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine monitoring of gastric residual for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012937.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Sivam Thanigainathan, Binu Ninan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,252,832
of 16,109,166 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,791
of 11,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,134
of 330,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,109,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.