↓ Skip to main content

Projected urban growth in the southeastern USA puts small streams at risk

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Projected urban growth in the southeastern USA puts small streams at risk
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0222714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter C. Van Metre, Ian R. Waite, Sharon Qi, Barbara Mahler, Adam Terando, Michael Wieczorek, Michael Meador, Paul Bradley, Celeste Journey, Travis Schmidt, Daren Carlisle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Other 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Engineering 4 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,442,493
of 20,581,464 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,352
of 177,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,652
of 348,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#44
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,581,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.