You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Greening of the Earth and its drivers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Climate Change, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nclimate3004 |
| Authors |
Zaichun Zhu, Shilong Piao, Ranga B. Myneni, Mengtian Huang, Zhenzhong Zeng, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Stephen Sitch, Pierre Friedlingstein, Almut Arneth, Chunxiang Cao, Lei Cheng, Etsushi Kato, Charles Koven, Yue Li, Xu Lian, Yongwen Liu, Ronggao Liu, Jiafu Mao, Yaozhong Pan, Shushi Peng, Josep Peñuelas, Benjamin Poulter, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Benjamin D. Stocker, Nicolas Viovy, Xuhui Wang, Yingping Wang, Zhiqiang Xiao, Hui Yang, Sönke Zaehle, Ning Zeng |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,921 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 230 | 12% |
| Canada | 109 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 92 | 5% |
| France | 70 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 49 | 3% |
| Australia | 43 | 2% |
| Spain | 39 | 2% |
| Finland | 18 | <1% |
| Germany | 16 | <1% |
| Other | 147 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1108 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1747 | 91% |
| Scientists | 115 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 31 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 1% |
| Unknown | 6 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,733 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1693 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 363 | 21% |
| Researcher | 312 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 188 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 103 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 92 | 5% |
| Other | 286 | 17% |
| Unknown | 389 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 455 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 311 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 225 | 13% |
| Engineering | 53 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 2% |
| Other | 157 | 9% |
| Unknown | 506 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2714. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,527
of 24,500,598 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#19
of 4,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21
of 303,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#2
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,500,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.