↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive Identification of Herpetofauna: Pairing Conservation Dogs and Genetic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 2,131)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noninvasive Identification of Herpetofauna: Pairing Conservation Dogs and Genetic Analysis
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.21772
Authors

Mark J. Statham, Deborah A. (Smith) Woollett, Susan Fresquez, Jerene Pfeiffer, Jonathan Richmond, Alice Whitelaw, Ngaio L. Richards, Michael F. Westphal, Benjamin N. Sacks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 36%
Environmental Science 6 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 8%
Chemistry 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 156. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#189,170
of 21,172,126 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#11
of 2,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,352
of 349,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,172,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.