↓ Skip to main content

Identifying important barriers to recruitment of patients in randomised clinical studies using a questionnaire for study personnel

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying important barriers to recruitment of patients in randomised clinical studies using a questionnaire for study personnel
Published in
Trials, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3737-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Isaksson, Per Wester, Ann Charlotte Laska, Per Näsman, Erik Lundström

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Psychology 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,283,636
of 16,148,319 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,654
of 4,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,640
of 330,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#252
of 593 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,148,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 593 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.