You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Attribute development and level selection for a discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of health care providers for capitation payment mechanism in Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13561-019-0247-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melvin Obadha, Edwine Barasa, Jacob Kazungu, Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro, Jane Chuma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 4 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,923,458
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#47
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,271
of 363,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them