↓ Skip to main content

Early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours) versus delayed enteral nutrition (after 48 hours) with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early enteral nutrition (within 48 hours) versus delayed enteral nutrition (after 48 hours) with or without supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012340.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulina Fuentes Padilla, Gabriel Martínez, Robin WM Vernooij, Gerard Urrútia, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Xavier Bonfill Cosp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 17 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,113,994
of 15,404,980 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,098
of 11,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,714
of 325,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,404,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.