↓ Skip to main content

Vampire Bats that Cooperate in the Lab Maintain Their Social Networks in the Wild

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Vampire Bats that Cooperate in the Lab Maintain Their Social Networks in the Wild
Published in
Current Biology, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon P Ripperger, Gerald G Carter, Niklas Duda, Alexander Koelpin, Björn Cassens, Rüdiger Kapitza, Darija Josic, Jineth Berrío-Martínez, Rachel A Page, Frieder Mayer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Bachelor 25 17%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 39%
Environmental Science 15 10%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 40 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 798. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2024.
All research outputs
#24,663
of 26,096,076 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#241
of 14,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#498
of 381,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#4
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,096,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.