↓ Skip to main content

SIMILAR, BUT NOT THE SAME: Comparing Editorial and News Agendas in Brazilian Newspapers

Overview of attention for article published in Journalism Practice, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
SIMILAR, BUT NOT THE SAME: Comparing Editorial and News Agendas in Brazilian Newspapers
Published in
Journalism Practice, October 2019
DOI 10.1080/17512786.2019.1684833
Authors

Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques, Edna Miola, Isabele Mitozo, Camila Mont’Alverne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,403,457
of 13,877,566 outputs
Outputs from Journalism Practice
#96
of 541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,778
of 230,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism Practice
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,877,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.