↓ Skip to main content

The zinc spark is an inorganic signature of human egg activation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
37 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
208 tweeters
facebook
68 Facebook pages
googleplus
12 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
The zinc spark is an inorganic signature of human egg activation
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep24737
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca E. Duncan, Emily L. Que, Nan Zhang, Eve C. Feinberg, Thomas V. O’Halloran, Teresa K. Woodruff

Abstract

Egg activation refers to events required for transition of a gamete into an embryo, including establishment of the polyspermy block, completion of meiosis, entry into mitosis, selective recruitment and degradation of maternal mRNA, and pronuclear development. Here we show that zinc fluxes accompany human egg activation. We monitored calcium and zinc dynamics in individual human eggs using selective fluorophores following activation with calcium-ionomycin, ionomycin, or hPLCζ cRNA microinjection. These egg activation methods, as expected, induced rises in intracellular calcium levels and also triggered the coordinated release of zinc into the extracellular space in a prominent "zinc spark." The ability of the gamete to mount a zinc spark response was meiotic-stage dependent. Moreover, chelation of intracellular zinc alone was sufficient to induce cell cycle resumption and transition of a meiotic cell into a mitotic one. Together, these results demonstrate critical functions for zinc dynamics and establish the zinc spark as an extracellular marker of early human development.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 208 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 31%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Chemistry 12 12%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 13 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 496. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,922
of 14,388,905 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#297
of 74,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#797
of 263,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#17
of 3,103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,388,905 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.