↓ Skip to main content

Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design, planning and implementation lessons learnt from a surgical multi-centre randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3649-0
Authors

Katie Biggs, Daniel Hind, Mike Bradburn, Lizzie Swaby, Steve Brown

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 5 29%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Psychology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,382,069
of 16,849,755 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,073
of 4,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,325
of 333,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#282
of 599 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,849,755 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 599 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.