↓ Skip to main content

Is seeing believing? The effects of virtual reality on young children’s understanding of possibility and impossibility

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Children and Media, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Is seeing believing? The effects of virtual reality on young children’s understanding of possibility and impossibility
Published in
Journal of Children and Media, November 2019
DOI 10.1080/17482798.2019.1684964
Authors

Anastasia Schmitz, Richard Joiner, Paul Golds

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,378,710
of 13,865,726 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Children and Media
#54
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,159
of 223,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Children and Media
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,865,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.