Title |
How Do We See Art: An Eye-Tracker Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00098 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Carlos Pedreira |
Abstract |
We describe the pattern of fixations of subjects looking at figurative and abstract paintings from different artists (Molina, Mondrian, Rembrandt, della Francesca) and at modified versions in which different aspects of these art pieces were altered with simple digital manipulations. We show that the fixations of the subjects followed some general common principles (e.g., being attracted to saliency regions) but with a large variability for the figurative paintings, according to the subject's personal appreciation and knowledge. In particular, we found different gazing patterns depending on whether the subject saw the original or the modified version of the painting first. We conclude that the study of gazing patterns obtained by using the eye-tracker technology gives a useful approach to quantify how subjects observe art. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 23% |
India | 3 | 5% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
Japan | 2 | 3% |
Argentina | 2 | 3% |
South Africa | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Belarus | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 57 | 92% |
Scientists | 4 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 163 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 20% |
Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
Researcher | 25 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
Professor | 16 | 9% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 46 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 16 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 11 | 6% |
Engineering | 10 | 6% |
Other | 47 | 27% |
Unknown | 25 | 14% |