You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Do We See Art: An Eye-Tracker Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Carlos Pedreira |
| Abstract |
We describe the pattern of fixations of subjects looking at figurative and abstract paintings from different artists (Molina, Mondrian, Rembrandt, della Francesca) and at modified versions in which different aspects of these art pieces were altered with simple digital manipulations. We show that the fixations of the subjects followed some general common principles (e.g., being attracted to saliency regions) but with a large variability for the figurative paintings, according to the subject's personal appreciation and knowledge. In particular, we found different gazing patterns depending on whether the subject saw the original or the modified version of the painting first. We conclude that the study of gazing patterns obtained by using the eye-tracker technology gives a useful approach to quantify how subjects observe art. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 23% |
| India | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 90% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 28% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2021.
All research outputs
#833,071
of 24,261,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#384
of 7,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,815
of 188,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#8
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,261,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.