You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
プレガバリンは腎機能を考慮した推奨用量でも腎機能低下患者の有害事象発生率が高い
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.4009/jsdt.48.155 |
| Authors |
成末 まさみ, 杉本 悠花, 柴田 龍二郎, 大坪 俊夫, 平田 純生 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,094,137
of 24,766,831 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#52
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,947
of 363,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,766,831 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.