You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro fertilization does not increase the incidence of de novo copy number alterations in fetal and placental lineages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-019-0620-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masoud Zamani Esteki, Triin Viltrop, Olga Tšuiko, Airi Tiirats, Mariann Koel, Margit Nõukas, Olga Žilina, Katre Teearu, Heidi Marjonen, Hanna Kahila, Jeroen Meekels, Viveca Söderström-Anttila, Anne-Maria Suikkari, Aila Tiitinen, Reedik Mägi, Sulev Kõks, Nina Kaminen-Ahola, Ants Kurg, Thierry Voet, Joris Robert Vermeesch, Andres Salumets |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 16% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
| Australia | 6 | 9% |
| Finland | 4 | 6% |
| Belgium | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 54% |
| Scientists | 28 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#459,399
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,536
of 9,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,397
of 380,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#44
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.