| Title |
Resistance to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease in an APOE3 Christchurch homozygote: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-019-0611-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph F. Arboleda-Velasquez, Francisco Lopera, Michael O’Hare, Santiago Delgado-Tirado, Claudia Marino, Natalia Chmielewska, Kahira L. Saez-Torres, Dhanesh Amarnani, Aaron P. Schultz, Reisa A. Sperling, David Leyton-Cifuentes, Kewei Chen, Ana Baena, David Aguillon, Silvia Rios-Romenets, Margarita Giraldo, Edmarie Guzmán-Vélez, Daniel J. Norton, Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado, Arabiye Artola, Justin S. Sanchez, Juliana Acosta-Uribe, Matthew Lalli, Kenneth S. Kosik, Matthew J. Huentelman, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Rebecca A. Reiman, Ji Luo, Yinghua Chen, Pradeep Thiyyagura, Yi Su, Gyungah R. Jun, Marcus Naymik, Xiaowu Gai, Moiz Bootwalla, Jianling Ji, Lishuang Shen, John B. Miller, Leo A. Kim, Pierre N. Tariot, Keith A. Johnson, Eric M. Reiman, Yakeel T. Quiroz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,764 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 591 | 21% |
| United States | 223 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 55 | 2% |
| Spain | 34 | 1% |
| Colombia | 25 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 20 | <1% |
| Germany | 14 | <1% |
| France | 14 | <1% |
| Australia | 14 | <1% |
| Other | 138 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1636 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2483 | 90% |
| Scientists | 222 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 759 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 759 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 134 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 86 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 6% |
| Other | 120 | 16% |
| Unknown | 185 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 176 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 140 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 92 | 12% |
| Unknown | 226 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3343. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,809
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#37
of 9,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20
of 381,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#1
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.