↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of potential sources of sauger Sander canadensis for reintroduction into Lake Erie

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Great Lakes Research, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of potential sources of sauger Sander canadensis for reintroduction into Lake Erie
Published in
Journal of Great Lakes Research, December 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2019.09.027
Authors

Travis Hartman, Jeff Tyson, Kevin Page, Wendylee Stott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Unspecified 1 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,806,978
of 14,860,150 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#901
of 1,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,405
of 322,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#35
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,860,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.