↓ Skip to main content

Successful implementation of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy at a medical respite facility for homeless patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hospital Medicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 2,134)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
58 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Successful implementation of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy at a medical respite facility for homeless patients
Published in
Journal of Hospital Medicine, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/jhm.2597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison M Beieler, Timothy H Dellit, Jeannie D Chan, Shireesha Dhanireddy, Leslie K Enzian, Tamera J Stone, Edward Dwyer-O'Connor, John B Lynch

Abstract

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe way to administer intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy to patients with the potential to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS). Often, homeless patients with complex infections, who could otherwise be treated as an outpatient, remain in the hospital for the duration of IV antibiotic treatment. Injection drug use (IDU) is a barrier to OPAT. To evaluate our experience with administering OPAT to homeless patients at a medical respite facility and determine if patients could complete a successful course of antibiotics. Using retrospective chart review, demographics, diagnosis, and comorbidities including mental illness, current IDU, and remote IDU (>3 months ago) were recorded. Surgical, microbiologic, and antimicrobial therapy including route (IV or oral), duration of therapy, and adverse events were abstracted. Homeless patients >18 years old who received OPAT at medical respite after discharge, no exclusions. Primary outcome was successful completion of OPAT at medical respite. Secondary outcome was successful antimicrobial course completion for a specific diagnosis. Forty-six (87%) patients successfully completed a defined course of antibiotic therapy. Thirty-four (64%) patients were successfully treated with OPAT at medical respite. Readmission rate was 30%. The average length of OPAT was 22 days. The cost savings to our institution (using $1500/day inpatient cost) was $25,000 per episode of OPAT. OPAT can be successful in a supervised medical respite setting for homeless patients with the help of a multidisciplinary team, and can decrease inpatient LOS resulting in cost savings. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 472. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#47,710
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hospital Medicine
#7
of 2,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,073
of 299,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hospital Medicine
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.