↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Journal Club: Experience from the International Urology Journal Club

Overview of attention for article published in European Urology Focus , November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Journal Club: Experience from the International Urology Journal Club
Published in
European Urology Focus , November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.euf.2019.10.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isaac A. Thangasamy, Stacy Loeb, Niranjan J. Sathianathen, Michael Leveridge, Brian Stork, Benjamin J. Davies, Henry H. Woo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,530,755
of 13,851,111 outputs
Outputs from European Urology Focus
#446
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,085
of 216,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology Focus
#28
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,851,111 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.