You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Journal Club: Experience from the International Urology Journal Club
European Urology Focus , March 2021
Isaac A. Thangasamy, Stacy Loeb, Niranjan J. Sathianathen, Michael Leveridge, Brian Stork, Benjamin J. Davies, Henry H. Woo
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||11||50%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||3||14%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||9%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||7||13%|
|Student > Master||4||8%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||4||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||21%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from European Urology Focus
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 420,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology Focus
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.