↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional status of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) workers across an agricultural land-use gradient

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Nutritional status of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) workers across an agricultural land-use gradient
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-52485-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew D. Smart, Clint R. V. Otto, Jonathan G. Lundgren

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,309,392
of 14,153,050 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#17,848
of 72,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,516
of 316,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,551
of 13,787 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,153,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13,787 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.