You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinicians’ Perspectives on Barriers to Discussing Infertility and Fertility Preservation With Young Women With Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14511 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Covelli, Marcia Facey, Erin Kennedy, Christine Brezden-Masley, Abha A Gupta, Ellen Greenblatt, Nancy N Baxter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 53% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2020.
All research outputs
#499,340
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,400
of 7,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,044
of 367,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#95
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.