↓ Skip to main content

Clinicians’ Perspectives on Barriers to Discussing Infertility and Fertility Preservation With Young Women With Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Clinicians’ Perspectives on Barriers to Discussing Infertility and Fertility Preservation With Young Women With Cancer
Published in
JAMA Network Open, November 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Covelli, Marcia Facey, Erin Kennedy, Christine Brezden-Masley, Abha A. Gupta, Ellen Greenblatt, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2020.
All research outputs
#323,610
of 17,003,338 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#904
of 3,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,347
of 334,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#48
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,003,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.