↓ Skip to main content

Origin and evolution of the Notch signalling pathway: an overview from eukaryotic genomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Origin and evolution of the Notch signalling pathway: an overview from eukaryotic genomes
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eve Gazave, Pascal Lapébie, Gemma S Richards, Frédéric Brunet, Alexander V Ereskovsky, Bernard M Degnan, Carole Borchiellini, Michel Vervoort, Emmanuelle Renard

Abstract

Of the 20 or so signal transduction pathways that orchestrate cell-cell interactions in metazoans, seven are involved during development. One of these is the Notch signalling pathway which regulates cellular identity, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis via the developmental processes of lateral inhibition and boundary induction. In light of this essential role played in metazoan development, we surveyed a wide range of eukaryotic genomes to determine the origin and evolution of the components and auxiliary factors that compose and modulate this pathway.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
France 3 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 228 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 27%
Researcher 61 24%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Master 24 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 16 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 20 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,717,587
of 12,373,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#634
of 2,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,541
of 93,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.