You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1188-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberta W. Scherer, Ian J. Saldanha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 37% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| South Africa | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 50% |
| Scientists | 10 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Librarian | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 22% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,007,150
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#128
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,315
of 383,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.