↓ Skip to main content

Increased effort during partial ventilatory support is not associated with lung damage in experimental acute lung injury

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased effort during partial ventilatory support is not associated with lung damage in experimental acute lung injury
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40635-019-0272-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dietrich Henzler, Alf Schmidt, Zhaolin Xu, Nada Ismaiel, Haibo Zhang, Arthur S. Slutsky, Paolo Pelosi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,779,586
of 13,999,449 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#129
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,912
of 272,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,999,449 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.