You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From small-scale forest structure to Amazon-wide carbon estimates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-13063-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edna Rödig, Nikolai Knapp, Rico Fischer, Friedrich J. Bohn, Ralph Dubayah, Hao Tang, Andreas Huth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 22% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#243,698
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#3,616
of 47,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,896
of 365,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#113
of 1,454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.