↓ Skip to main content

The APHIRM toolkit: an evidence-based system for workplace MSD risk management

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The APHIRM toolkit: an evidence-based system for workplace MSD risk management
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12891-019-2828-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodi Oakman, Wendy Macdonald

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 35 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Engineering 7 9%
Psychology 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 36 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#20,587,621
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,690
of 4,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,301
of 362,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#74
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.