↓ Skip to main content

Clinical translation of the assets of biomedical engineering – a retrospective analysis with looks to the future

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Medical Devices, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Clinical translation of the assets of biomedical engineering – a retrospective analysis with looks to the future
Published in
Expert Review of Medical Devices, October 2019
DOI 10.1080/17434440.2019.1685869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yijin Ren, Paul H. Fagette, Connie L. Hall, Herman Broers, David W. Grainger, Henny C. Van Der Mei, Henk J. Busscher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,813,547
of 14,122,411 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Medical Devices
#238
of 494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,680
of 312,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Medical Devices
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,411 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 494 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.