You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical translation of the assets of biomedical engineering – a retrospective analysis with looks to the future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Expert Review of Medical Devices, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/17434440.2019.1685869 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yijin Ren, Paul H. Fagette, Connie L. Hall, Herman Broers, David W. Grainger, Henny C. Van Der Mei, Henk J. Busscher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#14,928,997
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Medical Devices
#401
of 717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,391
of 363,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Medical Devices
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.