↓ Skip to main content

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation
Published in
Critical Care, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2606-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng-Si Luo, Guan-Jiang Huang, Lun Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,124,593
of 14,015,503 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,914
of 4,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,165
of 276,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#310
of 345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,015,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.