↓ Skip to main content

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients after planned extubation
Published in
Critical Care, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2606-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng-Si Luo, Guan-Jiang Huang, Lun Wu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,852,083
of 16,178,068 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,537
of 5,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,421
of 327,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#340
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,178,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.