↓ Skip to main content

Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
43 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005312.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruoling Guo, Max H Pittler, Edzard Ernst

Abstract

Hawthorn extract is advocated as an oral treatment option for chronic heart failure. Also, the German Commission E approved the use of extracts of hawthorn leaf with flower in patients suffering from heart failure graded stage II according to the New York Heart Association.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 34%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Unspecified 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Other 14 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#312,566
of 13,710,419 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#827
of 10,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,992
of 121,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,710,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.