You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hawthorn extract for treating chronic heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005312.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruoling Guo, Max H Pittler, Edzard Ernst |
| Abstract |
Hawthorn extract is advocated as an oral treatment option for chronic heart failure. Also, the German Commission E approved the use of extracts of hawthorn leaf with flower in patients suffering from heart failure graded stage II according to the New York Heart Association. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Hungary | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#526,403
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#927
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,250
of 168,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.