You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The synergistic effect of chlorotoxin-mApoE in boosting drug-loaded liposomes across the BBB
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-019-0546-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Beatrice Formicola, Roberta Dal Magro, Carlos V. Montefusco-Pereira, Claus-Michael Lehr, Marcus Koch, Laura Russo, Gianvito Grasso, Marco A. Deriu, Andrea Danani, Sandrine Bourdoulous, Francesca Re |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 3 | 75% |
South Africa | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#13,661,006
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#428
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,288
of 360,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.