You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maintenance of Skills, Competencies, and Performance in Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Time to Lay the Foundation for a Universal Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Allergy Organization Journal, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1097/wox.0b013e31825546b4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Todor A. Popov, Dennis Ledford, Richard Lockey, Ruby Pawankar, James T. Li, Hae Sim Park, Werner Pichler, Noel Rodriguez Perez, Paolo Tassinari, Fulvio Braido, Sami Bahna, Dirceu Solé, Connie Katelaris, Stephen Holgate, on behalf of the World Allergy Organization Education Council |
| Abstract |
Allergist/clinical immunologist maintenance of certification and training program reaccreditation are mandatory in some countries. The World Allergy Organization conducted surveys in 2009 and 2011 to assess where such programs were available and to promote the establishment of such programs on a global level. This was done with the presumption that after such an "inventory," World Allergy Organization could offer guidance to its Member Societies on the promotion of such programs to assure the highest standards of practice in the field of allergy and clinical immunology. This review draws on the experience of countries where successful programs are in place and makes recommendations for those wishing to implement such programs for the specialty. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 25% |
| Argentina | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 41% |
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 26% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#663
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,455
of 174,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.