↓ Skip to main content

Escaping the Disengagement Dilemma: Two Field Experiments on Motivating Citizens to Report on Public Services

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Political Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 tweeters
Title
Escaping the Disengagement Dilemma: Two Field Experiments on Motivating Citizens to Report on Public Services
Published in
British Journal of Political Science, November 2019
DOI 10.1017/s0007123419000322
Authors

Mark T. Buntaine, Daniel L. Nielson, Jacob T. Skaggs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#843,477
of 13,968,546 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Political Science
#129
of 764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,484
of 254,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Political Science
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,968,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.