↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of shoe-length fit between people with and without diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a case–control study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of shoe-length fit between people with and without diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a case–control study
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-5-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alistair D McInnes, Farina Hashmi, Lisa J Farndon, Amanda Church, Maria Haley, Debora M Sanger, Wesley Vernon

Abstract

Amongst the many identified mechanisms leading to diabetic foot ulceration, ill-fitting footwear is one. There is anecdotal evidence that people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy wear shoes that are too small in order to increase the sensation of fit. The aim of this study was to determine whether people with diabetic sensory neuropathy wear appropriate length footwear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 40%
Student > Master 9 19%
Researcher 4 8%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 19%
Arts and Humanities 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,831,722
of 14,510,247 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#414
of 566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,674
of 123,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,510,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them